JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 24, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Martha Lucia Gonzalez Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente al Juzgado 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá para los efectos señalados en este auto con relación al desistimiento de las pretensiones, dentro del trámite de la tutela promovida por la ciudadana de la referencia contra CAJANAL, toda vez que la Corte consideró que para el presente caso se reúnen los requisitos para la procedencia del desistimiento de las pretensiones de tutela.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitir el presente expediente al Juzgado Veinticinco (25) Civil del Circuito de Bogota para los efectos senalados en este auto con relacion al desistimiento de las pretensiones, dentro del tramite de la accion de tutela promovida por la senora Martha Lucia Gonzalez Ramirez contra CAJANAL.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.